Is Collaboration Just a Buzzword? (Repost)
When I started researching and thinking about collaboration so that I could train people to be better at it, I spent some time looking around at what others thought collaboration was … how the term was being used … how it was showing up.
I found that oftentimes, collaboration is just a buzzword … a code word for saying: “I can fit in” or “I can relate to other people”. It’s even used to market technology that’s really meant to help people share information, leaving people with the impression that by using the technology, they’re collaborating.
It doesn’t help that the dictionary definition is so generic. The Merriam-Weber dictionary describes collaboration as “to work jointly with others or together especially in an intellectual endeavour”. It’s not wrong, but I’d suggest it’s not really right either. According to this definition, if I sit at the kitchen table with my 4-year-old granddaughter with some crayons and we draw a picture, we will have collaborated. It’s not what comes to mind when I think of collaboration; something is missing.
So, let’s make it clearer. Here’s how I define collaboration:
Collaboration is a creative process that builds connections between people by exploring and developing new innovative ideas to achieve a common purpose.
If you take away one of the dynamics, you aren’t collaborating.
Without purpose, you have a group of people chatting about interesting ideas. Imagine sitting with your friends at the local pub. Lots of ideas generated in a group setting, but in most instances, the creativity is never translated into action, or anything else.
Without a group of people functioning together … well … this one is really just somebody thinking up cool ideas. Definitely not collaboration.
Without creativity, you have a group of people working to achieve some purpose. To me, this is teamwork. Teamwork makes use of the skills in the team to get something done. Only when they begin working as a group to develop new or novel ways of working does it become collaboration. Think of a yard cleaning crew or a team of surgeons. They typically aren’t inventing new ways of doing their work, they are simply applying their skills to a job.
Each dynamic is a process that is unique to the circumstances.
Collaboration isn’t a recipe where you mix ingredients and always get what you want. Each process is constantly adapting to accommodate how the people involved are interacting and reacting. While you might see similar tactics being used between collaborative efforts, those tactics are constantly being adjusted to meet the needs of the group. Even inside a long-standing, well-functioning group, collaborative processes adapt to the current emotional states and reactions of the group.
***
I think this kind framework with its three dynamics allows collaboration to move beyond just being a buzzword. You mix together a challenging problem, different personalities and emotional states, a sprinkle of our typical biases, a variety of life experiences, usually with a limited amount of time to work together … and you get a sense of why collaboration can be so challenging … and so rewarding.
Happy Collaborating!
Scott Millar often works as a "peacemaker" by gathering people with different experiences and values and helping them navigate beyond their differences to tackle complex problems together. Through Collaboration Dynamics, he offers a program in High Performance Collaboration, where he guides groups to explore the nature of collaboration, inclusivity, and innovation, and acquire new abilities to create the conditions that enable groups to contribute and thrive in challenging environments.
Scott is also the host of the Cool Collaborations podcast where he explores fun stories and insights of successful collaboration with guests from around the world, and then dives into what made them work. Cool Collaborations is currently available on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, and Spotify.